Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
The Journal of the Korean Academy of Periodontology ; : 117-124, 2008.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-209388

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to histomorphometrically evaluate the osteoconductivity of a new biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics with fully interconnected microporous structure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Osseous defects created in the rabbit calvaria were filled with four different bone graft substitutes. Experimental sites were filled with a new fully interconnected microporous biphasic calcium phosphate with(BCP-2) or without(BCP-1) internal macropore of 400micrometer in diameter. MBCP(Biomatlante, France) and Bio-Oss(Geistlich Pharma, Switzerland) were used as controls in this study. Histomorphometric evaluation was performed at 4 and 8 weeks after surgery. RESULT: In histologic evaluation, new bone formation and direct bony contact with the graft particles were observed in all four groups. At 4 weeks, BCP-1(15.5%) and BCP-2(15.5%) groups showed greater amount of newly formed mineralized bone area(NB%) compared to BO(11.4%) and MBCP(10.3%) groups. The amounts of NB% at 8 weeks were greater than those of 4 weeks in all four groups, but there was no statistically significant differences in NB% between the groups. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that new bone substitutes, BCP with interconnected microporous structure and with or without internal macroporous structures, have the osteoconductivity comparable to those of commercially available bone substitutes, MBCP and Bio-Oss.


Subject(s)
Bone Substitutes , Calcium , Ceramics , Hydroxyapatites , Minerals , Osteogenesis , Skull , Transplants
2.
The Journal of the Korean Academy of Periodontology ; : 825-838, 2007.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-24273

ABSTRACT

Endosseous implants are used in the treatment of various types of tooth loss, and numerous long-term studies have demonstrated the excellent reliability of this method of treatment. However, the increase of implant failure are associated with inadequate quality and/or height of bone. At the end of the 1980s, Wide(>3.75mm) implants were initially used for managing these difficult bone situations. The recommended indications for its use included poor bone quality, inadequate bone height, immediate placement in fresh extraction sockets, and immediate replacement of failed implants. At the 2000s, wider implants(6.0mm and 6.5mm) were used in a few studies. Although good clinical outcomes have been reported in recent years, there is still a controversy on this topic. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to estimate the survival rate of wide implants(6.0~8.0mm) in molar regions, evaluating the clinical outcome. In this study, 1135 RBM surfaced wide implants(Rescue(TM), MEGAZEN Co., Korea/ 595 maxillary, 540 mandibular) were placed in 650 patients(403 male, 247 female/age mean: 51.2+/-11.1 years, range 20 to 83 years). Of the total, 68.3% were used to treat fully or partially edentulous situations, including single-tooth losses and 31.7% were placed immediately after teeth extraction or removal of failed implants, of which all were in the molar regions. Implant diameter and length ranged from 6.0 to 8.0mm and from 5.0 to 10.0mm, respectively. The implants were followed for up to 42 months (mean: 14.6+/-9.5 months). Of 1135 placed implants, 58 implants were lost. Among them, 53 implants were lost within 12 months after implant placement. The survival rate was 93.6% in the maxilla and 96.3% in the mandible, yielding an overall survival rate of 94.9%, for up to 42 months. As the result of Cox regression model, prosthetic type, sinus graft, and patient gender have an statistical significance on the implant survival rate in this study. This study suggests that the use of wide implants(6.0~8.0mm) would provide a predictable treatment alternative in posterior areas.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Mandible , Maxilla , Molar , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Tooth , Tooth Loss , Transplants
3.
The Journal of the Korean Academy of Periodontology ; : 151-164, 2007.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-8005

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The sinus floor elevation procedures have been used to facilitate implant placement in the severely atrophic posterior maxilla. Many variables may have an influence on the outcomes of the sinus floor elevation in combination with implant treatment. The aim of this study was to analyze survival rate of implants placed in the edentulous maxillae of patients in whom sinus floor elevation was undertaken according to variables. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It consisted of 96 patients(50 male and 46 female), ranging in age from 31 to 70 years(mean 49 years), who underwent sinus floor elevation procedure(94 implants in left side and 106 implants in right side) from 2001 to 2002. A total of 200 implants were placed in the grafted sinus(73 implants in lateral approach and 127 implants in crestal approach). All implants were restored by fixed prosthesis. All patients were healthy. Follow-up periods for implants were between 48 to 60 months. RESULTS: The cumulative survival rate of implants was 91.5%. Gender, age and operation site did not have an influence on the survival rate. There was statistically significant differences for the implants which placed in less than 4 or 5 mm residual bone height, the survival rate was 60%, 81.4% respectively (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference of implants survival rate according to approach technique. The survival rate for 100% autogenous bone grafts was lower with respect to composite grafts containing autogenous bone and 100% substitutes. The survival rate for hydroxyapatite-coated implants was statistically significant lower than other textured group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Residual bone height, surface texture and graft materials have an influence on the survival rate. To use autogenous bone as a part of a composite bone replacement, implant texture which leads to more favorable implant-bone interface were necessary. To determine residual bone height for initial implant stability was important.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Follow-Up Studies , Maxilla , Prostheses and Implants , Survival Analysis , Survival Rate , Transplants
4.
The Journal of the Korean Academy of Periodontology ; : 165-180, 2007.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-8004

ABSTRACT

Dental Implants have been proved to be successful prosthetic modality in edentulous patients for 10 years. However, there are few reports on the survival of implant according to location in molar regions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 4~5 years' cumulative survival rate and the cause of failure of dental implants in different locations for maxillary and mandibular molars. Among the implants placed in molar regions in Gwangju Mir Dental Hospital from Jan. 2001 to Jun. 2002, 473 implants from 166 patients(age range; 26~75) were followed and evaluated retrospectively for the causes of failure. We included 417 implants in 126 periodontally compromised patients, 56 implants in 40 periodontal healthy patients, and 205 maxillary and 268 mandibular molar implants. Implant survival rates by various subject factors, surgical factors, fixture factors, and prosthetic factors at each location were compared using Chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival analysis was done for follow-up(FU) periods. The overall failure rate at 5 years was 10.2%(subject level) and 5.5%(implant level). The overall survival rates of implants during the FU periods were 94.5% with 91.3% in maxillary first molar, 91.1% in maxillary second molar, 99.2% in mandibular first molar and 94.8% in mandibular second molar regions. The survival rates differed significantly between both jaws and among different implant locations(p or =5.75 mm) and the survival rate was significantly lower for wider implant diameter(p<0.01) in mandibular second molar region. Among 5 surface types(acid etched, SLA, TPS, RBM, and HA), the survival rate of SLA type implant was the highest during the FU periods and the failure rates of HA type implants was significantly high following functional loading. Among 26 failed implants, 20 resulted in early failure of osseointegration or infection prior to functional loading, and 6 were removed because of progressive bone loss or implant fracture. In conclusion, implant survival rates were different in different locations on the posterior jaws, and the fixture diameter and surface type were the significant factor for implant survival in mandibular 2nd molar region. This observation suggests that implant treatment planning might require region-specific manner.


Subject(s)
Humans , Dental Implants , Jaw , Mandible , Maxilla , Molar , Osseointegration , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Survival Rate , Transplants
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL